- The CSRD requires real estate and construction players to produce standardized ESG reporting (ESRS), audited, based on double materiality.
- Key indicators: Scope 1-3 emissions (sites, materials), building energy performance, circularity, health and safety.
- In scope: large and mid-sized companies; SMEs affected via the subcontracting chain (VSME to prepare).
- Dual stake: compliance plus easier access to green financing (Taxonomy link).
The CSRD, an extension of non-financial reporting for real estate and construction
The CSRD requires large companies and mid-sized entities to publish standardized non-financial information under the ESRS. It succeeds the NFRD and strengthens transparency, comparability and audit of sustainability data. For real estate and construction players, it structures reporting around double materiality: how their activities affect the environment and society, and how ESG issues affect their financial performance.
The complete action plan to succeed in your CSR assessments
Structure your governance and data to make your real estate portfolio CSRD-ready
Why the CSRD redefines the sector's ESG priorities
Real estate and construction players sit at the crossroads of climate, energy and social issues. The CSRD becomes structuring on three levels: regulatory and financial risk (investors and lenders increasingly condition financing on reporting quality); stakeholder pressure (institutional tenants, authorities and large buyers require reliable data on carbon footprint, energy performance and social practices); and strategic opportunity (robust data on energy efficiency, circularity or site safety strengthens asset value).
Which companies are concerned and when?
In scope: large companies and significant mid-sized entities in development, asset management, construction and related services; European subsidiaries of international groups with over €150M EU turnover. Unlisted SMEs are not directly bound but face strong indirect reporting pressure through the value chain and investors.
Data expected for CSRD reporting in real estate and construction
The ESRS cover 12 topics. For this sector, central indicators include:
- Environment: Scope 1-3 GHG emissions (sites, materials, energy), building energy performance, material circularity and construction-waste management, biodiversity impact.
- Social: worker health and safety (sites), working conditions and subcontractor compliance, social dialogue and local roots.
- Governance: ESG risk-steering structure, internal control and audit methods, supply-chain due diligence.
How to prepare: governance, data and systems
Compliance requires operational transformation: embed sustainability in governance with explicit board oversight; abandon scattered files and centralize ESG data on a platform ensuring traceability; prioritize indicators by double materiality; and adopt internal assurance before mandatory external verification. A dedicated CSRD platform orchestrates these steps and aligns with ESRS or EcoVadis frameworks.
Prepare your real estate business for the CSRD
Our experts help you standardize portfolio data, run double materiality and prepare for audit
Sector-specific challenges and levers
The sector faces asset heterogeneity (standardizing data across old and new portfolios), supply-chain complexity (many subcontracting tiers and material suppliers), Scope 3 data consolidation, and internal skills gaps. Best practices: a central data repository, dedicated ESG software, and support from double materiality experts to ensure consistent, credible indicators.
CSRD and access to sustainable financing
The CSRD reshapes how investors and banks perceive ESG risk. Clear, auditable information on energy performance, carbon management and social practices eases access to green financing, sustainable bonds or preferential rates. The link with the EU Taxonomy reinforces this: CSRD data feeds the classification criteria that condition the eligibility of real estate and construction projects for responsible financing.
CSRD in real estate and construction: key takeaways
| Theme | Key points | Implication for the sector |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | Mandatory EU directive for large and mid-sized companies | Aligns ESG reporting on audited standards |
| Main objective | Standardize, strengthen and audit ESG data | Greater transparency for investors and clients |
| Key requirement | Double materiality and ESRS reporting | Requires ESG governance and structured collection |
| Major data | GHG, energy, circularity, safety, social impact | Precise tracking of emissions and building performance |
| Challenges | Heterogeneous assets, Scope 3 data, subcontracting | Need for robust data management |
| Opportunity | Easier access to green financing | Competitive edge via transparency and compliance |
