- The duty of vigilance, created by France's March 27, 2017 law, requires large companies to prevent human rights and environmental harm across their value chain.
- It applies to groups with more than 5,000 employees in France (or 10,000 worldwide, subsidiaries included), with a cascading effect on suppliers and subcontractors.
- A vigilance plan rests on five pillars: risk mapping, assessment procedures, prevention actions, alert mechanisms, and monitoring.
- Non-compliance exposes a company to formal notice, civil litigation, damages, and significant reputational risk.
Origin and legal framework of the duty of vigilance
The duty of vigilance stems from France's law of March 27, 2017, the first in the world to impose a legal obligation on certain companies to prevent serious harm to human rights and the environment. This law inspired European frameworks (the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive) and international ones (UN Guiding Principles, Global Compact).
It follows the same logic as CSR and ESG criteria: embedding the management of social and environmental risks into corporate governance. The goal is to turn non-financial vigilance into a legal requirement, with documented and verifiable obligations.
The complete action plan to succeed in your CSR assessments
A practical guide to structure your approach, centralize your evidence and meet your compliance obligations
Which companies are concerned and what is the scope
The law primarily targets large French companies:
- More than 5,000 employees in France, or
- More than 10,000 employees worldwide (subsidiaries included).
Its reach goes well beyond that circle. SMEs that act as subcontractors or suppliers to these groups are directly affected, since they must document their practices to meet their buyers' requirements.
The duty of vigilance therefore spreads across the entire value chain through a cascading effect, raising ESG compliance expectations even for players not directly subject to the law.
The building blocks of a vigilance plan
The vigilance plan brings together all the measures a company deploys to identify, prevent, mitigate and monitor the risks tied to its own activities and those of its partners. At a minimum, it must include:
- Risk mapping: analysis of serious risks to human rights, health and the environment across all activities and supply chains.
- Assessment procedures: regular evaluation of subsidiaries, subcontractors and suppliers.
- Prevention and mitigation actions: corrective plans, training, contractual clauses and audits.
- Alert and reporting mechanisms: channels accessible to any internal or external stakeholder.
- Monitoring and reporting: annual review of the measures' effectiveness, with results included in the management report.
Building and implementing the vigilance plan
The vigilance process follows a continuous-improvement logic close to an ESG or ISO management system (Plan-Do-Check-Act).
- Initial diagnosis: identify priority risk areas through risk mapping and a materiality analysis.
- Formalization: draft a documented vigilance plan, approved by governance and shared with stakeholders.
- Operational rollout: embed the requirements into business processes (procurement, HR, production).
- Evidence collection and control: regularly audit suppliers and subsidiaries, and track key indicators (audit rates, reported incidents).
- Reporting: publish and revise the plan at regular intervals based on feedback and observed results.
For partner SMEs, these obligations can be translated into simplified compliance policies: codes of conduct, vigilance training or specific contractual clauses.
IRO library for CSRD
A practical tool to identify, classify and prioritize your impacts, risks and opportunities when mapping your risks
Sanctions and liability for non-compliance
Failing to establish or apply a vigilance plan can lead to:
- A formal notice from any legitimate stakeholder (NGOs, unions, victims, etc.);
- Civil litigation before French civil courts;
- Damages where harm is proven to be linked to a lack of vigilance.
Beyond the financial risk, inaction or a plan deemed insufficient can seriously damage a company's reputation and ESG credibility.
Challenges and best practices for an effective duty of vigilance
Implementing a credible duty of vigilance means going beyond minimal compliance. The most advanced companies rely on management tools drawn from ESG frameworks:
- CSR assessments to validate the robustness of policies and indicators.
- Double materiality to prioritize the most critical issues.
- Supplier codes of conduct and training to spread a risk-aware culture.
- Digital ESG management tools to centralize data and automate compliance evidence.
Secure your vigilance plan with an expert
Our experts help you map your risks, structure your evidence and steer your ESG compliance
The corporate duty of vigilance: key takeaways
| Key point | In short |
|---|---|
| Legal origin | France's 2017 law requiring heightened vigilance over human rights and the environment. |
| Companies concerned | French groups with 5,000 to 10,000+ employees, with an indirect effect on their suppliers and subcontractors. |
| Vigilance plan | A public document covering risk mapping, prevention actions, monitoring and reporting. |
| Non-compliance | Legal risks (formal notice, damages), reputational and commercial exposure. |
| ESG management tools | Audits, materiality, codes of conduct and tracking platforms to simplify compliance and improve traceability. |

